Archive 10: When the Opponents Felt the Pain – Tweets, Media Attacks & Field Threats | By Dhafer Al-Zayani Introduction

In this tenth archive, I present documents that demonstrate how free words alone were powerful enough to cause pain to opponents. From hostile tweets, to state-sponsored media articles, and even direct field threats, these examples reveal how words can shake and terrify those who try to silence the truth.

📌 Document One: Hostile Tweet

Hostile tweet (original in Arabic).

Analysis:

The tweet directly targeted me by name, instead of addressing my ideas or arguments.
This reflects the genuine pain felt by the other side, as my words exposed them publicly.
Historical note: Personal attacks are always indirect admissions of influence.

📌 Document Two: Al-Alam Media Article

Al-Alam TV article (original in Arabic).

Analysis:

The attack escalated from individual Twitter accounts to official state media, mentioning me explicitly.
The article attempted to portray me as an “enemy” using sectarian and political rhetoric.
Historical note: When your words reach the official media of your adversaries, it proves they were truly hurt.

📌 Document Three: Field Threat

Field threat video: Watch here

Analysis:

The confrontation went beyond online and media attacks, escalating into direct death threats.
The first attempt was intimidation: breaking my car windows to spread fear.
The response was stronger: publishing news of the attack in more than a thousand forums under the name Nasser Al-Bahrain.
Result: The attackers backed down, fearing the backlash of public opinion.
Lesson: Media terrifies terrorists and aggressors more than weapons ever could.

📌 Document Four: Voices from Twitter (Supporters vs. Opponents)

Tweets from supporters and opponents (original in Arabic).

Analysis:

Supportive tweets prove that my voice was not isolated, but part of a wider national current.
Hostile tweets reveal the pain my words caused, leading opponents to continuous defamation and smear attempts.
Historical note: The electronic battle was fought between two fronts, and truth always finds witnesses to stand by it.

✨ Conclusion

These documents — the hostile tweet, the Al-Alam article, the field threat, and the voices from Twitter — together form a complete picture of that stage of the electronic battle. Opponents resorted to defamation, intimidation, and even threats of violence. Yet in the end, they retreated, because when the truth is widely exposed, it becomes their greatest fear.

👉 Lesson for future generations: If they attack you, it is because your words made them feel the pain.